The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K competition is a fight of flagships for the highest-end of the gaming marketplace, however the chips take tremendously other approaches to serving up main efficiency. The Core i9-13900K wields Intel’s Thirteenth-Gen Raptor Lake x86 hybrid structure to sq. off in opposition to AMD’s chiplet-based Zen 4 Ryzen 7000 chips, however AMD has a trick up its sleeve — the 2d-Gen 3-d V-Cache tech, which fuses on a 3-d-stacked cache chiplet atop the processor to ship market-leading gaming efficiency. Those two basically other approaches have shaken up our checklist of the absolute best CPUs for gaming, however each and every manner has its respective strengths.
AMD’s $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D is geared particularly for players taking a look to blast thru CPU-limited video games whilst nonetheless having the threaded heft of 16 cores that stay aggressive within the heaviest of productiveness workloads. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D does lag competition in some productiveness apps because of the tradeoffs related to the 3-d chip-stacking tech, and it does not boost up all video games similarly. Then again, something is bound — it’s the quickest gaming chip in the marketplace.
The $589 Intel Core i9-13900K is Intel’s quickest gaming processor, and whilst it’s not somewhat as rapid as AMD’s Ryzen 9 7950X3D in gaming, it has a miles friendlier ticket and serves up ultra-competitive efficiency in each gaming and productiveness apps. Intel additionally continues to give a boost to DDR4 reminiscence to provide a less-expensive trail for developers, reducing the bar for access to flagship efficiency even additional. In the meantime, AMD’s resolution to give a boost to most effective DDR5 has confirmed to be a pricing ache level.
The other strengths of those two chips make for a hard resolution in case you are taking a look to select one to your subsequent high-end construct. Underneath now we have taken the Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D competition thru a six-round faceoff to look which chips take the crown in our gaming and alertness benchmarks, together with different key standards like energy intake and pricing. Let’s examine how they stack up.
Contents
- 1 Options and Specs: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
- 2 Gaming Benchmarks and Efficiency: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
- 3 Productiveness Efficiency: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
- 4 Overclocking: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
- 5 Energy Intake, Potency, and Cooling: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
- 6 Pricing: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
- 7 Backside Line: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Options and Specs: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Side road/MSRP | Cores / Threads (P+E) | P-Core Base / Spice up Clock (GHz) | E-Core Base / Spice up Clock (GHz) | Cache (L2/L3) | TDP / PBP / MTP | Reminiscence | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | $699 | 16 / 32 | 4.2 / 5.7 | 144MB (16+128) | 120W / 162W | DDR5-5200 | |
Core i9-13900KS | $699 | 24 / 32 (8+16) | 3.0 / 6.0 | 2.2 / 4.3 | 68MB (32+36) | 150W / 253W / 320W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-5600 |
Core i9-13900K / KF | $589 (Ok) – $564 (KF) | 24 / 32 (8+16) | 3.0 / 5.8 | 2.2 / 4.3 | 68MB (32+36) | 125W / 253W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-5600 |
AMD’s $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D comes packing 16 Zen 4 cores and the corporate’s second-gen 3-d V-Cache tech that unlocks 128MB of L3 cache, a combo that delivers the quickest gaming efficiency to be had in the marketplace. The 7950X3D has the similar underlying design because the Ryzen 9 7950X with a central I/O die and two eight-core compute chiplets that supply a complete of 16 cores and 32 threads.
Not like the usual 7950X, some of the 7950X3D’s compute chiplets comes with an extra 3-d-stacked L3 cache and boosts to five.25 GHz. In the meantime, the ‘usual’ compute chiplet with out cache boosts to five.7 GHz, the similar as the usual 7950X (main points right here). In spite of the decrease frequency, the cache-equipped chiplet supplies the most productive efficiency for video games, whilst the speedier chiplet is absolute best for productiveness packages. As such, AMD designed an cutting edge new driving force that is helping steer threads for various kinds of workloads to the proper chiplet.
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D brings the entire facilities we’d be expecting from a contemporary processor, together with give a boost to for DDR5, PCIe 5.0, and the most recent USB connectivity requirements. AMD has additionally added built-in graphics for a elementary show out for the primary time, which is a plus if you want to troubleshoot. You’ll see our iGPU checking out right here.
The 7950X3D sips energy — it has a base TPD of 120W and a max 162W PPT, which is 68W not up to the 170W/230W score for the usual 7950X. The decrease energy threshold will lead to much less efficiency in heavy packages, however you’ll be able to nonetheless want to plan for a 240mm to 280mm AIO (or higher) for the most productive efficiency.
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D calls for an AM5 motherboard, so dear DDR5 reminiscence is your best option. Sadly, DDR5 remains to be a lot more costly than DDR4 reminiscence. Granted, that pricing drive is not as a lot of a attention on the excessive finish, however you will have to issue it into your buying resolution. The AM5 platform is new, so the Ryzen 7000 chips are not backward suitable with older AM4 motherboards. Then again, AMD will give a boost to the AM5 platform till 2025+.
AMD most effective allowed overclocking the reminiscence and Infinity Material for the previous-gen 5800X3D, however the 7950X3D additionally provides give a boost to for each the auto-overclocking Precision Spice up Overdrive (PBO) and the Curve Optimizer. Sadly, AMD nonetheless doesn’t permit direct frequency overclocking because of a voltage limitation for some of the chiplets.
Intel’s $589 sixteen-core Core i9-13900K comes with 8 hyper-threaded P-cores and 16 single-threaded E-cores, for a complete of 32 threads. That is an build up of 8 further E-cores over the previous-gen Core i9-12900K, equating to extra threaded horsepower. You’ll additionally avoid wasting money with the $564 Core i9-13900KF, which has similar specifications however lacks the built-in GPU.
Intel nonetheless makes use of the ‘Intel 7’ procedure node for Raptor Lake however leveraged a more moderen revision of the silicon to push clock speeds larger whilst bettering energy potency. The P-cores include a three.0 GHz base, however, extra importantly, a 5.8 GHz spice up that is a whopping 600 MHz build up over the prior gen. In the meantime, the E-cores now have a three.0 GHz base (+600 MHz) and stretch as much as 4.3 GHz (+400 MHz), which means that now not most effective do you get extra E-cores, however you additionally get extra out of each and every core.
The Core i9-13900K may be geared up with 32MB of L3 cache and 36MB of L2 and drops into current 600-series motherboards or the brand new 700-series fashions. The chip comes with the built-in UHD Graphics 770 engine with 32 EUs that spice up as much as 1.65 GHz.
Intel’s chips now have a Processor Base Energy (PBP) price as a substitute of a TDP metric, and a secondary Most Turbo Energy (MTP) price that denotes the perfect energy point right through spice up process. The 13900K comes with 125W PBP (base) and 253W MTP (top) energy scores, however bear in mind that the chip can all the time perform on the 253W MTP when it’s below load, although the true energy use will range with software depth. Intel lets in complete overclockability, however most effective whilst you pair the chip with a Z-series motherboard.
Winner: Tie
The Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D fight yields a tie on this class. Each chips give a boost to DDR5 and the PCIe 5.0 interface, which means neither has an inherent connectivity benefit.
Intel has the good thing about backward compatibility for DDR4 and the 600-series chipset, enabling lower-cost reminiscence and motherboards for price seekers (caveats observe). Intel additionally has its Raptor Lake Refresh chips at the horizon, which means there shall be yet another technology of upgrades for the LGA 1700 platform.
AMD’s new AM5 platform most effective helps dear DDR5 and carries a top rate over the Intel motherboard ecosystem, but it surely does come up with the money for prolonged ahead compatibility — AMD plans on supporting the AM5 platform till 2025+.
Given its new hybrid structure with two varieties of cores, Intel’s core counts are not without delay related to AMDs because of their other functions. Our efficiency effects will dictate the efficiency price of the total designs.
Gaming Benchmarks and Efficiency: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Bear in mind, this text is an outline of our a lot more in-depth checking out in our AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Overview. Underneath you’ll see the geometric imply of our gaming exams with the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K at 1080p and 1440p, with each and every decision cut up into its personal chart. As standard, we are checking out with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 to scale back GPU-imposed bottlenecks up to imaginable, however variations will shrink with lesser playing cards or larger resolutions.
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D lives as much as its billing because the quickest gaming chip on the earth, beating out Intel’s flagship through spectacular margins in some titles. We additionally see the 7950X3D take a large lead within the geometric imply of our check suite, however bear in mind that the 3-d V-Cache doesn’t boost up all titles similarly. Due to this fact, you will have to additionally take a look at the person sport benchmarks within the above album to evaluate the total development.
In our checking out, the $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 12% sooner than the $589 Core i9-13900K at 1080p gaming at inventory settings, and 9% sooner when the chips are overclocked. The latter ranking is discouraging for Intel — the 13900K consumes way more energy but nonetheless can not beat the 7950X3D. As a reminder, Intel launched its limited-edition Core i9-13900KS as a preemptive strike in opposition to the 7950X3D, however regardless of its spectacular 6 GHz spice up clock and large ticket, it gives mainly the similar gaming efficiency because the $589 Core i9-13900K. As such, it additionally falls in the back of the 7950X3D.
Whilst the 7950X3D is 12% sooner than the 13900K on this choice of titles, it additionally prices 19% extra. As discussed above, you’ll additionally equip the 13900K with DDR4 to avoid wasting much more money, however bear in mind that you’ll be able to lose a couple of proportion issues of gaming efficiency on moderate (see our checking out right here).
Transferring over to 1440p pushes the bottleneck extra against the GPU, so the adaptation between the chips shrinks. As an example, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 8% sooner than the Core i9-13900K at 1440p, and that shrinks to a three% distinction after each chips are overclocked. It is logical to suppose that the majority high-end gaming programs will use higher-resolution displays, so the variations might be slight, however the 7950X3D offers you extra headroom for long run GPU upgrades.
Bear in mind that giant deltas in particular person sport titles, as we see with the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, affect cumulative measurements. You’ll see examples of that during titles like Microsoft Flight Simulator 2021, A ways Cry 6, and F1 2021. Our check suite closely favors the enhancements from 3-d V-Cache, so we additionally incorporated a desk beneath with effects from an extra 5 video games that we don’t usually check. You’ll additionally to find AMD’s personal benchmarks in a huge fluctuate of titles on the finish of the above album to come up with an concept of efficiency good points in different titles. As with any vendor-provided benchmarks, take AMD’s slides with a grain of salt.
As all the time, the AMD vs Intel festival can range in accordance with the identify and the GPU you employ, so it is best to make an educated resolution in accordance with the varieties of titles you play steadily.
Tom’s {Hardware} – 1080p Extras | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Core i9-13900K | 7950X3D vs 13900K |
Grand Robbery Auto V | 182.4 fps | 185.5 fps | -1.7% |
Challenge Automobiles 3 | 357.6 fps | 295 fps | +21.2% |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 332.2 fps | 274.6 fps | +21% |
Borderlands 3 | 231.6 fps | 186.4 fps | +24.3% |
Horizon 0 Crack of dawn | 264.7 fps | 218 fps | +21.4% |
Winner: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
On moderate, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the quickest gaming chip cash can purchase. In our check suite, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 12% sooner than the Core i9-13900K at 1080p gaming and eight% sooner at 1440p. After overclocking, the ones deltas shrink to 9% and three% at 1080p and 1440p, respectively.
Those gaming effects include a couple of caveats: The 7950X3D does not boost up all video games, and the Core i9-13900K prices 19% much less earlier than we consider its a lot decrease general platform prices. Then again, you’ll be able to all the time pay a disproportionate top rate for main efficiency, and on the finish of the day, a win is a win.
As all the time, we do not counsel chips on this worth fluctuate in case you are most effective eager about gaming — you’ll be able to to find lower-priced choices from each AMD and Intel which might be a a ways higher price for gaming. Then again, there’ll all the time be the ones made up our minds to construct the completely quickest gaming gadget without reference to charge, and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the quickest gaming chip lately to be had for the ones high-end builds.
In the meantime, the remainder of us will have to almost certainly wait to look how the eight-core $449 Ryzen 7 7800X3D fares when it arrives in April. This chip will most probably be offering just about the similar gaming efficiency because the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, however at a miles lower cost.
Productiveness Efficiency: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
We will boil down efficiency in productiveness apps into two huge classes: single- and multi-threaded. The primary slide above displays the geometric imply of efficiency in numerous of our maximum essential exams within the single-threaded class, however make sure to take a look at the expanded ends up in the above album.
The Core i9-13900K is 17% sooner than the usual Ryzen 9 7950X3D configuration in single-threaded paintings. Now we have two overclocked configs right here for the 7950X3D — the auto-overclocked PBO, and PBO blended with undervolting (PBO UV). Particularly, the PBO UV config narrows the 13900K’s lead in single-threaded paintings to 11%.
Naturally, the ones efficiency deltas may not lift over to each and every form of workload. Then again, flipping throughout the album of check effects unearths that the Core i9-13900K excels in single-threaded paintings, which might in the end supply snappier efficiency than the 7950X3D in mild packages. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D does lead within the AVX-512 y-cruncher benchmark, however Intel leads all different lightly-threaded benchmarks.
The primary slide within the above album comprises a geometrical imply of efficiency in numerous of our multi-threaded benchmarks. In multi-threaded paintings, the $589 Core i9-13900K is 4% sooner than the $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D at inventory settings, and a trifling 1% sooner after overclocking. Either one of those chips serve up quite a lot of efficiency in this kind of paintings, but when gaming is not as essential and you are searching for the maximum efficiency in threaded apps, the usual Ryzen 9 7950X is the easier selection.
Winner: Intel Core i9-13900K
The Core i9-13900K gives a extra balanced profile in each single- and multi-threaded productiveness packages than the 7950X3D, handing over forged efficiency in each disciplines. By contrast, whilst the Ryzen 9 7950X3D stays inside putting distance in threaded packages, it loses somewhat slightly of steam in single-threaded paintings. Now not most effective does that lead to slower efficiency in lighter workloads and not more responsiveness, however it might additionally hamstring efficiency in standard real-world productiveness workloads — those continuously come with each lightly-threaded and multi-threaded parts within the workflow, and considerably slower efficiency in both class hampers general efficiency.
AMD’s Ryzen 7950X3D does get pleasure from {hardware} acceleration to hurry AVX-512 workloads, a bonus over the 13900K in increasingly heavily-threaded duties, however those proceed to be rather uncommon for almost all of customers. Given its general awesome mix of efficiency in productiveness packages, the Core i9-13900K takes the win.
Overclocking: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Now we have lengthy since reached the land of diminishing returns for overclocking the highest-end chips from AMD and Intel, just like the Ryzen 9 and Core i9 households. As a result of AMD has pulled Intel right into a dogfight for efficiency superiority at the excessive finish, a lot of the overclocking frequency headroom is rolled into usual inventory efficiency. Then again, there are nonetheless a minimum of some good points available, and each Intel and AMD disclose tunable parameters and complex device overclocking utilities, like Intel’s XTU and AMD’s Ryzen Grasp.
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D does not give a boost to overclocking by means of the CPU multiplier, so you’ll’t trade the core clocks without delay. You additionally can’t modify CPU voltage without delay. Then again, you’ll overclock the reminiscence and upholstery. AMD has additionally added give a boost to for changing the ability limits (PPT, TDC, EDC) throughout the auto-overclocking Precision Spice up Overdrive (PBO) characteristic, and you’ll additionally now undervolt the X3D chips the use of the Curve Optimizer. Those options weren’t supported at the previous-gen fashion. You’ll to find quite a lot of examples of the PBO and PBO+UV settings in our 7950X3D overview.
In the meantime, the Intel Core i9-13900K exposes each and every knob imaginable for tweaking and tuning. Then again, its competitive out-of-the-box energy and boosting algorithms already eat many of the overclocking headroom that you must reach with standard cooling. Sub-zero overclockers with unique cooling answers can achieve a lot larger with the 13900K than the 7950X3D, however that’s not as treasured to the vast majority of customers.
Overclocking %age achieve over inventory | Intel Core i9-13900K @ 5.6 | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D PBO |
Gaming (1080p) | +5.5% | +2.65% |
Unmarried-Threaded | -2.5% | +2% |
Multi-Threaded | +3% | +2% |
As standard, overclocking efficiency good points can boil down for your good fortune within the silicon lottery. As you’ll see above, overclocking with standard cooling for each the Intel and AMD processors ends up in rather minimum good points in packages. Actually, the 13900K in truth suffers from decrease efficiency in single-threaded paintings as a result of its 5.6 GHz overclock is not up to its inventory 5.8 GHz spice up. The Core i9-13900K does achieve 5.5% in gaming, a better proportion achieve than the 7950X3D, but it surely nonetheless lags in the back of the 7950X3D’s top gaming efficiency.
Winner: Tie
The payoff for overclocking is terribly restricted with lately’s excessive finish chips. Nonetheless, each platforms have a wealth of tunable parameters for fans, their respective overclocking benefits, and a collection of auto-overclocking and device utilities. In fact, devoted tuners may to find greater efficiency boosts through overclocking the core, cloth, and reminiscence extra aggressively than we have now, however keep in mind that you are all the time on the whims of the silicon lottery on the subject of overclocking.
AMD’s 3-d V-Cache era prevents direct voltage and frequency manipulations, however AMD has unlocked reminiscence, cloth, Precision Spice up Overdrive, and undervolting by means of the Curve Optimizer, all of which mix to offer quite a lot of avenues for enhancing efficiency by means of more than a few tuning tactics. Actually, the 7950X3D continuously delivers a equivalent quantity of efficiency uplift because the Core i9-13900K, appearing the worth of its fairly unconventional approaches.
In the meantime, Intel gives much more overclocking capability and the perfect top frequencies you’ll get from direct tuning. Then again, a lot of that capacity is already uncovered proper out of the field by means of the corporate’s competitive boosting applied sciences and sky-high energy limits, thus decreasing its price to informal overclockers.
Energy Intake, Potency, and Cooling: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is extremely energy environment friendly, drawing a ways much less energy than both the usual 7950X or the competing Core i9-13900KS, thus handing over excellent energy potency that ranks one of the best we’ve ever examined. A snappy look on the HandBrake renders-per-day-per-watt metric displays that the potency festival is not even shut — the 7950X3D is the hand’s down winner.
AMD’s Ryzen chips have superb energy and potency metrics, however the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is much more environment friendly as it has a decrease 120W TDP score. This implies the chip is very similar to a 7950X working moderately above the 105W Eco Mode. By contrast, Intel’s chip consumes way more energy in each and every form of workload, leading to larger thermal output.
Winner: AMD
Intel has made quite a lot of development in decreasing its energy intake metrics, however the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a lot more energy environment friendly. Now not most effective does the 7950X3D eat a ways much less top energy, but it surely additionally delivers extra paintings in line with unit of energy ate up. That ends up in a win in energy intake, potency, and thermal output, in the end providing you with a cooler and quieter gadget.
Neither of those chips comes with a bundled cooler, however Intel’s larger energy intake way you’ll be able to want extra competitive, and thus costlier, cooling to extract the height efficiency.
Pricing: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Tom’s {Hardware} – Decrease is Higher | Bucks-per-fps — Chip Simplest | Bucks-per-fps — Chip, board, reminiscence |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | $3.09 | $4.73 |
Intel Core i9-13900K | $2.95 | $4.14 (DDR4) — $4.37 (DDR5) |
The Core i9-13900K has spectacular efficiency for its $598 ticket, and you’ll even move graphics-less to avoid wasting money with the $564 Core i9-13900KF fashion. That is exceptionally aggressive pricing in opposition to AMD’s $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D, but it surely does lag in top gaming efficiency. Normalizing the efficiency values to a dollars-per-fps metric displays that they’re lovely carefully matched in relation to gaming price, however as you’ll see once we issue within the general platform charge above, there are different components at play.
Each the 13900K and the 7950X3D are absolute best fitted to high-end motherboards, however AMD’s X670/E motherboards lately get started at more or less $80 greater than Intel’s Z790. The Core i9-13900K may be suitable with previous-gen motherboards if they’ve the correct BIOS, and function would be the identical between 600- and 700-series if the ability supply is the same. That suggests that you must make a choice a DDR5 Z690 motherboard that provides just about all of the identical facilities because the Z790 and feature quite a lot of lower-cost choices that prevent much more money.
Pricing for an acceptable reminiscence equipment may be a sticking level. To avoid wasting money, you’ll move with DDR4 with the 13900K and sacrifice a couple of proportion issues of gaming efficiency whilst protecting the total efficiency in productiveness packages. The financial savings are steep: You’ll be able to pay round $60 greenbacks first of all 32GB of DDR4, however pricing begins at $105 for 32GB of DDR5. That DDR5 tax is unavoidable for Ryzen 9 7950X3D customers. Moreover, possibly the most productive reminiscence equipment is the only you don’t have to shop for — many upgraders most probably have already got a DDR4 equipment, which is a plus.
Winner: Intel Core i9-13900K
The $589 Core i9-13900K has a decrease ticket than the $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D, however the fps-per-dollar contest is a wash if we most effective consider chip pricing.
Then again, the excessive charge of AMD’s X-series motherboards provides further charge for your construct in comparison to Intel’s Z790 platform. Moreover, you’ll go for a previous-gen Z690 to avoid wasting much more money on a 13900K construct (make sure to guarantee BIOS compatibility).
The excessive worth top rate for DDR5 additionally remains to be a sticking level even for a higher-tier Ryzen 9 construct. You’ll be able to pay just about two times as a lot for DDR5 reminiscence than DDR4 reminiscence, and DDR5 is a strict requirement for AMD’s 7950X3D. Total, those components mix to make the Ryzen 9 7950X3D a miles pricier construct, giving the Core i9-13900K the lead within the pricing class.
Backside Line: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Row 0 – Cellular 0 | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Intel Core i9-13900K |
Options and Specs | X | X |
Gaming | X | Row 2 – Cellular 2 |
Productiveness Packages | Row 3 – Cellular 1 | X |
Overclocking | X | X |
Energy Intake, Potency, and Cooling | X | Row 5 – Cellular 2 |
Pricing | Row 6 – Cellular 1 | X |
Overall | 4 | 4 |
The Core i9-13900K vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D fight results in a four-to-four tie, however the contest is not as shut because the ranking implies. In any case, each and every of those processors has its personal distinct benefits and drawbacks relying in your goal use case.
If you are development a no-holds-barred gaming rig and pricing is not a priority, the $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D is your chip. The 7950X3D is 12% sooner than the Core i9-13900K in our choice of gaming benchmarks. In fact, that incorporates the caveat that its 3-d V-Cache tech does not boost up all video games calmly, so the lead may range relying in your gaming variety. In both case, this chip is the present gaming champ, and it continuously is not an in depth contest. That is very true in some sport titles, like Microsoft Flight Simulator 2021 and F1 2021.
The $589 Core i9-13900K is not as sexy for a gaming-focused construct in case you are going with DDR5 reminiscence, but it surely turns into a lot more compelling with DDR4 in case you are taking a look to get right of entry to flagship-class efficiency at a lower cost level. You are going to sacrifice a couple of proportion issues of gaming efficiency with DDR4, however that you must save somewhat slightly of cash for different gadget components. Then again, in case you are strictly excited by flagship-level gaming at a extra reasonably priced worth, the less-expensive $409 Core i7-13700K gives just about the similar gaming efficiency because the 13900K.
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is aggressive in maximum varieties of apps, however its decrease efficiency in lightly-threaded duties can be a sticking level in case you are excited by productiveness paintings with complicated workflows. For productivity-focused programs, or in case you are most often searching for a forged all-rounder, the Core i9-13900K is the easier selection.
The 7950X3D holds the benefit in all energy intake metrics, together with top energy and potency, rating one of the best we’ve ever examined. That ends up in extra forgiving cooling necessities and a cooler and quieter gadget. At the different finish of the spectrum, overclocking is turning into increasingly more much less fascinating at the excessive finish for many fans — you’ll be able to get a greater payoff within the mid-range and low-end of the marketplace. The Intel and AMD processors each supply a minimum of some uplift after overclocking, making that contest a wash.
At the pricing entrance, the $699 Ryzen 9 7950X3D carries a hefty top rate that, blended with the excessive motherboard and reminiscence pricing, limits it to the highest-end gaming machines. However there’ll all the time be efficiency addicts keen to pay best greenback for the very best; for the ones, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D gives the quickest gaming efficiency cash can purchase. We additionally be expecting that the 7950X3D will see steep reductions through the years. In the meantime, the Core i9-13900K slots in as a extra reasonably priced possibility and a greater all-rounder in productiveness packages.
We usually do not counsel spending this a lot on a chip if gaming is your number one function — you’ll to find higher lower-cost choices from each camps. As an alternative, players will have to wait to look how the eight-core $449 Ryzen 7 7800X3D pans out when it arrives on April 6, 2023. AMD says it’ll just about fit the 7950X3D whilst handing over Core i9-13900K-beating efficiency at a miles lower cost level.
Intel Socket 1700 DDR5 (Z790) | Core i9-13900KS, Core i9-13900K, Core i7-13700K |
Motherboard | MSI MPG Z790 Carbon WiFi |
RAM | G.Ability Trident Z5 RGB DDR5-6800 – Inventory: DDR5-5600 | OC: XMP DDR5-6800 |
AMD Socket AM5 (X670E) | Ryzen 9 7950X3D, 7950X, 7900X, Ryzen 7 7700X |
Motherboard | ASRock X670E Taichi |
RAM | G.Ability Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 – Inventory: DDR5-5200 | OC/PBO: DDR5-6000 |
AMD Socket AM4 (X570) | Ryzen 9 5800X3D, 5800X, 5950X |
Motherboard | MSI MEG X570 Godlike |
RAM | 2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 – Inventory: DDR4-3200 | OC/PBO: DDR4-3800 |
All Methods | 2TB Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus, Silverstone ST1100-TI, Open Benchtable, Arctic MX-4 TIM, Home windows 11 Professional |
Gaming GPU | Asus RTX 4090 ROG Strix OC |
Software GPU | Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE |
Cooling | Corsair H150i, Inventory Cooler |
Overclocking word | All configurations with overclocked reminiscence even have tuned core frequencies and/or lifted energy limits. |
Supply By means of https://www.tomshardware.com/information/amd-ryzen-9-7950x3d-vs-intel-core-i9-13900k-faceoff